While at work, Crake develops a disease that becomes a global pandemic. As it turns out, only a few people are immune to this disease. Soon, only the Crakers and Snowman survive. Although I was not able to track the book extremely well, it appeared as if there was no true conclusion. The human race was modified, and then pushed to extinction. Perhaps this serves as an example of what will happen if our species does not attempt to combat climate change immediately. With rapidly decreasing resources comes a severe increase in competition amongst individuals, which drives people to take actions such as the ones in this book. Although I cannot see life on Earth going as it does in Oryx and Crake, there are some very powerful messages behind some of the events.
Oryx and Crake was by far my least favorite read of this entire class. Although I did not think I could bare to finish the book to conclusion, I did finally commit to reading it last night. Overall, I was very disturbed by some of the discussions in this book. All of the challenges that the main character Snowman faces stem from the implementation of genetically modified organisms in society. Although there will no doubt be problems that result if GMOs dominate society, I find it hard to believe that the events that occurred in this book could ever happen as they were presented in Oryx and Crake. For example, the humans eat their own feces, there are specific breeding seasons, human organs are grown inside pigoons, or pig-like creatures, and there are many elements of child pornography that are discussed. I personally would not recommend this book to anyone, but there many be individuals looking for a disturbing, post-apocolyptic read.
Margaret Atwood writes in a very intriguing way. I think she kind of has biblical references in this novel. For example, the Garden of Eden with Adam and Eve. The main character, Glenn, creates a human being. But it comes with consequences. Humans are driven to behave sinfully and we can relate that to climate change.
ReplyDeleteThis seems like a very difficult read for someone whose not used to this type of genre. I'm not quite sure I would be able to get through it! I wonder if certain excerpts of the book would be better used for a more dramatic climate change education approach?
ReplyDeleteThis book doesn't speak much to me either from what you have said. Props to you for keeping up with it though, and making some possible connections with climate change, which I found to be interesting.
ReplyDeleteDo you think this book would be acceptable to teach in schools? It seems a little inappropriate with the whole sex slave idea. I'm not too sure this is really a young adult novel.
ReplyDeleteThis seems like quite a different read. I like that even though this book doesn't seem to have very many ties to climate change, you found a way to connect it to some of the plausible conclusions that might arise from climate change. It definitely sounds like a read that would not be suitable for a large group, if this was to be assigned as a read for a class.
ReplyDeleteThis is so much different than anything we have read or talked about in this class. Was it the story line that you hated or the actual writing itself? I know you mentioned that you liked her other books.
ReplyDeleteThis book sounds like it has little to do with climate change. It also seems like it would be a very disturbing novel to read due to the actions taken by Snowman and Crake. I wonder if these YA novels are hinting towards a broader subject rather than a specific approach to climate change. Because climate change is also a background issue, it is possible that the authors of these novels are attempting to emphasize the corrupt actions behind climate change.
ReplyDeleteIt seems that we always talk about genetically modified organisms with a wariness and concern. And I think that is with good reason, you never know what they can become. However, maybe that is what it will come to if we want to be able to continue living on the Earth. Can you imagine a "human" that breathes carbon dioxide?
ReplyDelete